Read the original post on LinkedIn
The publication of a Safeguarding Adults Review is always a moment of reflection.
During the Board discussion, one member made a comment that will stay with me “I felt I knew Martin as a person after reading the report.” Of all the feedback received, that felt like the most important.
Martin’s story was complex. His final years were shaped by homelessness, alcohol dependence, the legacy of trauma and self-neglect.
The records told part of that story. His family told the rest.
Speaking with Martin’s sister reminded me that some of the most important evidence in any review sits outside the chronology. Families hold the context, the history, the strengths, the fears, the turning points and the small details that help explain how someone’s life unfolded.
Without those conversations, there is a risk that a person becomes reduced to service contacts, referrals and assessments.
As reviewers, we have a responsibility to tell someone’s final chapter with care.
This review highlighted important learning for the partnership around:
🔹 Recognising and responding to accumulating risk before concerns reach crisis point.
🔹 Moving beyond narratives of “disengagement” and understanding how trauma, literacy needs, executive functioning difficulties and addiction can affect a person’s ability to seek help and follow through with support.
🔹 Strengthening multi-agency escalation, and ensuring that the absence of a safeguarding process is not mistaken for the absence of risk.
🔹 Embedding trauma-informed, persistent and relationship-based approaches to engagement.
🔹 Improving the application of the Mental Capacity Act, particularly understanding the difference between decisional capacity and executive capacity.
🔹 Creating stronger multi-agency oversight for adults experiencing multiple disadvantage who do not fit neatly within existing thresholds.
My thanks go to Martin’s family for their trust, and to the practitioners and Board members who engaged so openly with the review process.
Ultimately, safeguarding reviews are about learning, improvement and prevention.
But before they are any of those things, they are about people.
And Martin deserved to be known as one.
